No, don't
No, don't answer that.
Labels: forbidden heds
posted by fev at 8:59 PM
Monday, October 10, 2011
No, don't answer that.
Previous Posts
- No, but thanks for asking
- Passive aggressive: Priming
- Uncle Charley and his head Teddy
- Ground control to Maj. Alinsky
- I'll bet they do
- Oil, that is
- Please be embarrassed
- War on Editing
- Why we teach this stuff
- War on Xpesmasse: Fifth column edition
Mailbag!
- vulteef [at] gmail [dot] com
- Testy Copy Editors
- ACES
- Bad Science
- Regret the Error
- Romenesko
- Common Sense Journalism
- You Don't Say
- EditTeach
- Ask the stylebook
- Media Watch
- Blogslot
- Editor's Desk
- Words at Work
- Ten Minutes Past Deadline
- Madam Grammar
- Media Myths Alert
- Old Word Wolf
- WSJ: Style and substance
- Today's Front Pages
- Language Hat
- Language Log
- The Greenbelt
- Language Politics
- Oxford University Press
- Mr. Verb and the other Verbs
- Wishydig
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Sentence First
- Online syntax textbook (Santorini & Kroch)
- Economist country briefings
- State Dept. country data
- Inflation calculator
- VassarStats
1 Comments:
Our paper has banned ALL "nouns, nouns and nouns, oh my" headlines. We get enough of the Oz stuff here in Kansas already (which compels me to repeat: Kansas is NOT Oz; it's where you want to get back to when you're stuck in Oz).
Post a Comment
<< Home